This is the first review I’ve been able to follow my rules for so you can imagine I’m more impressed then usual. I did have my share of thing I didn’t like but no OS is perfect. So for performance PCLinuxOS delivers better then any livecd Linux. It’s pertty fast, I got lots of programs open, and theres now lagging which is good. There are alot of great features as well. YOu can preview files in the file viewer, the wireless is configurable but I couldn’t find the driver it wanted so wireless is possible but a pain none the less. In terms of looks, I’m not the biggest fan of KDE and the fact that you can’t change the resolution as simply as on other distro’s however PCLinuxOS looks pretty In terms of usability wireless is a possiblility which I really like, it comes with all the programs you need, theres no need for codecs to play mp3’s you get firefox an instant messenger open office the gimp and much more right from the go which I really like. If the screen resolution was actualy adjustable without going through any trouble and the wireless automaticaly configured I can assure you this would be the distro if I do go through with a bet to only use Linux for a month, this would be the one I use because its very usable, fast, good looking, has lots of programs and feautres and I really like it but until those two change I’m sticking with windows and when iTUnes comes along for Linux as well I can say this will be the distro I switch to but it’s still to yet meet my three demands that Linux is gettign better at meeting.
and all in all I really didn’t like it. For performance off the live cd it was very slow even for a live cd and I hit a point where it just stoped. This was defenitly a very windows ME like version of Linux. It was very buggy, slow, there was no wireless and I couldn’t open up the network manager. I couldn’t even access my harddrive but when I pluged in my iPod it poped up right away which I found strange. There was no option to even get mp3 codecs in the defaul media player. Programs were plentiful, yet I can’t tell you what any of them really were it was a guessing game trying to find what to use and I didn’t see anything like The Gimp or Firefox or Gaim all I saw was oddly named programs starting with a K propietary to Fedora and possible the KDE desktop. However for lack of an IM client and a browser that felt like IE 6 and just the feeling of an older version of windows with some widgets and no name propietary software I was very unimpressed and displeased. The look and feel of the system alright, like I said very windows like so the adverage windows user would be able to navagate it clearly. I did break the rules on this review again though because after 5 minuits of trying to get to wordpress I could not stand it any longer, and I couldn’t find any program that would have any use. If I were to have to chose between Windows ME and Fedora 8 sadly I would take Windows ME no questions asked.